Dragons
Moderators: Forum Moderators, Active DMs
-
- Arelith Supporter
- Posts: 3293
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:02 am
- Location: Wandering Aimlessly in the Wiki
Re: Dragons
New to Arelith? Read this!
This is not a single player game. -Mithreas
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. -Winston Churchill
Re: Dragons
1: They were getting too common
2: Dragons are absurdly powerful compared to other 5% alternatives (Both mechanically and lorewise)
3: Dragons weren't properly portrayed by dragon players
3.5: Dragons behaving like humans was really harmful to the server atmosphere and setting
I for one am glad to see them gone. I never met a dragon PC that felt like an actual dragon and not a meme.
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 7:47 pm
Re: Dragons
Sockss wrote: There is an overriding premise that all changes should be appreciated and welcomed because someone has taken time out for free to make them. [...] I don't believe volunteering should put your work above criticism [...] .
Re: Dragons
Re: Dragons
Current Dragon Count: 4 Active Dragons
Total Dragon Count: 30*
Stats:
Abilities:
+2 Str
+2 Con
+2 Cha
Spell resistance: 11+Level (Capped at 32)
20/- cold resistance
True Seeing (in Dragon Form only)
Dragon Skin PrC feat
+4 ECL
Number of applications in the last month: 5
There were five applications this month that sought to play a dragon PC. However, these were not honoured as the race was in a retirement phase. I came to announce it so that people did not waste their time applying for it, when it was not going to be granted. They were great concepts; however, there are some major balancing issues when this race was first released.
The earliest iterations of Dragons were unbalanced on the above stats. There were some adjustments; however, not enough to warrant enabling them again. However, what is being done is a rotation of races and enabling more options for players to pick from at the 5% reward level. These new races will go through proper balancing with the appropriate team.
Note:
* 30 is representing the total database entries, without accounting for removal of deleted and duplicate characters and non-migrated characters. Some players remade with the same name and have two entries. However, four have only been played in the last 4 months.
Discord: @malkalz
Determine your Public CD Key here
Can't see your vault? Have you migrated your accounts? If you have tried, and still can't see them, message me.
Re: Dragons
I will repeat a few things that I already said in a Discord discussion about this and add other points :
The data you posted clearly shows that there are not "too many dragons". That point is clearly being disproven by only 4 different dragon PCs just coming online within the last 4 months.
About "I met a dragon PC and it didn't feel properly RPd" :
A dragon toon being missinterpreted by it's own player and behaving more like a cutesy "oh look what I can do :3 OwO" type of character rather than a creature of high intellect, might and fiercely bred royalty that purely moves around lesser beings for it's own reasons and agenda? That should be report worthy. Simple and easy.
I think it is a shame that a unique reward, one that was so hard to achieve and so well guarded behind applications, is now being removed entirely. Instead the population should've just been kept low, as it already was, and often checked on by DMs.
Yes, we are going back into the old topic of "But DMs already have enough to do", sure. But especially recently, since DMs adapted a harsher and more instantaneous way of giving out punishments and deciding on problemcases and situations there should be more time than ever to check in on active and online dragon PCs from time to time to see if they are abusing their dragon form mechanically or falsely RPing themselves.
Re: Dragons
Hi Richørd,Richørd wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 4:42 pmI will repeat a few things that I already said in a Discord discussion about this and add other points :
The data you posted clearly shows that there are not "too many dragons". That point is clearly being disproven by only 4 different dragon PCs just coming online within the last 4 months.
About "I met a dragon PC and it didn't feel properly RPd" :
A dragon toon being missinterpreted by it's own player and behaving more like a cutesy "oh look what I can do :3 OwO" type of character rather than a creature of high intellect, might and fiercely bred royalty that purely moves around lesser beings for it's own reasons and agenda? That should be report worthy. Simple and easy.
I think it is a shame that a unique reward, one that was so hard to achieve and so well guarded behind applications, is now being removed entirely. Instead the population should've just been kept low, as it already was, and often checked on by DMs.
Yes, we are going back into the old topic of "But DMs already have enough to do", sure. But especially recently, since DMs adapted a harsher and more instantaneous way of giving out punishments and deciding on problemcases and situations there should be more time than ever to check in on active and online dragon PCs from time to time to see if they are abusing their dragon form mechanically or falsely RPing themselves.
At no point did I say there was too many. They are not being phased out because of numbers. They are being phased out due to balance issues, and race rotation. Dragons may one day return with a new stats; however, they are not currently in the rotation as we have plans to introduce a few more races in its place that are unique as well.
Please do not take this list:
As the reason for why they were removed. Because that is not the case. There have been some excellently played dragons, and there are still excellently played dragons. But, there is a point where things get retired from active rotation and new things are introduced.Nitro wrote:If I were to hazard a guess:
1: They were getting too common
2: Dragons are absurdly powerful compared to other 5% alternatives (Both mechanically and lorewise)
3: Dragons weren't properly portrayed by dragon players
3.5: Dragons behaving like humans was really harmful to the server atmosphere and setting
Discord: @malkalz
Determine your Public CD Key here
Can't see your vault? Have you migrated your accounts? If you have tried, and still can't see them, message me.
Re: Dragons
Sorry, small missunderstanding.
You indeed never said that there were too many dragons. That's just a talking point I picked up from people who were in favor of / neutral about the removal of dragons as a 5% reward.
Quote : "They are being phased out due to balance issues, and race rotation. "
It surprises me that balance issues are being seen as a factor for this removal. I expected this to be a non-issue for races and classes that are gated behind 5% rewards (let's say you achieve a million coins of networth on your character? That's still on average 10 toons you have to sacrifice for this) and an application process that is never guaranteed to get you what you want.
I distinctively remember that one patch in which PaleMasters recieved massive buffs. The one that came before the class got unlocked and no longer required an application process and RPR to take levels in. I do not recall people being outraged over PMs being mechanically super-strong because they were so exclusive. It basically guaranteed that you would never encounter a PM player that just played the class for mechanical advantages. They were properly RPd and a menace, as they should be. Of course there might have been a few cases where abusers slipped through the cracks. But I prefered the situation back then over what we have these days.
Race rotation is a thing that always makes me wonder : Why is availability of content to players being limited to what the team deems to be "worthy being left in the game for now"?
-
- Posts: 330
- Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2018 7:47 pm
Re: Dragons
Four true dragons roaming an island group the size of Arelith and its surrounding small islands, in addition to the already existing NPC (most of them ancient) dragons (the Aurilite one, two on RDI, Darnoth, Orias, not counting the ones that are on other planes) is, in fact, a ridiculously high amount in terms of density.The data you posted clearly shows that there are not "too many dragons". That point is clearly being disproven by only 4 different dragon PCs just coming online within the last 4 months.
Sockss wrote: There is an overriding premise that all changes should be appreciated and welcomed because someone has taken time out for free to make them. [...] I don't believe volunteering should put your work above criticism [...] .
Re: Dragons
There is an area in the NWN:EE base campaign where you can fight three different dragons with just a few loading screens of distance inbetween.the grim yeeter wrote: ↑Sat Apr 27, 2019 6:05 pmFour true dragons roaming an island group the size of Arelith and it surrounding small islands, in addition to the already existing NPC (most of them ancient) dragons (the Aurilite one, two on RDI, Darnoth, Orias, not counting the ones that are on other planes) is, in fact, a ridiculously high amount in terms of density.The data you posted clearly shows that there are not "too many dragons". That point is clearly being disproven by only 4 different dragon PCs just coming online within the last 4 months.
Further Arelith is set in the year of 1372. Only a year before this :
(quoted from the forgottenrealms fandom wiki)
"Draconic rule came to an end when the elves created the Dracorage mythal, a powerful magical effect that incited all dragons across Faerûn to madness and mindless destruction, turning against each other and even against their offspring. This event became known as the Rage of Dragons. Dragons were unable to take control of Faerûn again, their collective power waxing and waning over the millennia. Although exceptions were recorded throughout history, the majority of Faerûn's dragons came to occupy the niche of top predator, not ruler.
After the last Rage of Dragons, in 1373 DR, the dragon population of Faerûn was greatly reduced in number. That realization sparked the need of dragons to look for the help of their gods, marking the prophesied "turning of the Great Cycle", an ancient myth that foretold the return of draconic religious fervor. The dragon gods who survived the long years without worshipers received a great influx of power from their new draconic followers. In 1374 DR, a new Tearfall caused several new dragon eggs to fall from the sky."
(end of quote)
Therefore we can assume that at this point in time the overall population of dragons has reached a new high. One big enough to warrant another use of the Dracorage mythal.
Re: Dragons
"They are being phased out due to balance issues, and race rotation."
which i think is healthy, because there are busted builds w/ them
Re: Dragons
You know this is kind of their prerogative & sole responsibility. This is their sandbox and we play in it.
-
- Posts: 1045
- Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 4:12 am
Re: Dragons
Re: Dragons
Given their stated aim, there is nothing stopping you from sitting on a reward till a later date. I'm sitting on a greater right now because the current line-up is either to close to things I'm playing already or it just doesn't interest me. That's the great part of the system...it will change!
The GrumpyCat wrote:I CLICK THE HOSTIBLE BUTTON NOW U ARE DED!
Irongron wrote:The slaughter, i am afraid, will not abate.
-
- Arelith Supporter
- Posts: 3293
- Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:02 am
- Location: Wandering Aimlessly in the Wiki
Re: Dragons
Because it's their job to make those decisions?
What?
New to Arelith? Read this!
This is not a single player game. -Mithreas
You have enemies? Good. That means you've stood up for something, sometime in your life. -Winston Churchill
Re: Dragons
Good point, doodRedGiant wrote: ↑Sun Apr 28, 2019 2:10 pmTake the long-term view on this. Race rotation and the fact that the staff continually bakes up new stuff for us to try is a good thing. Here we should probably just say, "thank you."
Given their stated aim, there is nothing stopping you from sitting on a reward till a later date. I'm sitting on a greater right now because the current line-up is either to close to things I'm playing already or it just doesn't interest me. That's the great part of the system...it will change!
Re: Dragons
I am with you on this. So to see them come back was rather shocking, I figured it would be a small window to be one.
One of the issues with the reward system is people sit on so many rewards that as soon as something like a dragon comes up there is a sudden rush so suddenly there are a lot of dragons and then slows down.
Re: Dragons
Re: Dragons
As a new player dragon is something I’ve desperately playing and rping sorta as using Druid and Wizard spell shape change. I wasn’t even aware the race existed and I’m honestly a bit sad to hear that it was something to of miss out on. I hope it’s better worked to make the dms happy with balance and fun for any who rp with it.
Slavery? Never heard of her.
-
- Dungeon Master
- Posts: 6573
- Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:47 pm
Re: Dragons
I'm afraid there are no plans to bring Dragons back. I won't say 'never ever ever ever.' But it's a very unlikely scenario in which we'd allow them again.
(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)