Xerah wrote: Wed Sep 13, 2023 3:57 am
Having recently gone through this with my bard 30 Vs bard 20/rdd10 I found I got 2 less AB and 3 less AC, however, I would have been rocked by a dispel. You can get to dispel level 27 but it’s really hard to spare 2 feats (and an extra attack). If that +3 Vs dispel would happen at 20 instead of 21 bard, it would be so much nicer.
It would actually be pretty cool if RDD simply gave full CL for 20+ bard or sorc characters. It mostly results in players being able to still get their spellbook as if they were pure, but would trade all of their bonus epic feats for that +4 untyped ac, since the str bonus is almost entirely irrelevant to a caster build. For melee build both and ac and str boosts are meaningful, but it wouldnt matter enough either, since 30 bard would still be much better than 20 bard 10 rdd, due to much superior song that gives bonus apr in selfish solo only if you're pure bard (and the rest of the differences between lvl 25 and lvl 30 song, and all the epic bonus feats on 23, 26, 29). It would be slightly ahead of pure bard in ac and ab, but at a huge cost. Seems legit for a major award imo.
The only way to competitively multiclass a bard rn is with 3 evangelist levels, as this allows for 28 song level with just 17 bard lvls and then a plethora of options for 6-10 lvls for a third class. Subsequently this also allows 17 bard 3 evangelist 10 rdd which really doesnt need any buffs rn. it doesnt need direct nerfs either since I know Healing Domain for cleric dips is on the chopping block. this build would not get the bonus cl since it doesnt have 20+ bard, so we're good on the evangelist dip front as well.
I think that's really all we need here for some flavor and build diversity, without making anything stronger than current options. Just giving full CL progression from RDD with 20+ bard/sorc.