Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

OOC General Discussion

Moderators: Forum Moderators, Active DMs

Post Reply
User avatar
Thake
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:12 am

Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Thake »

What do you think about linking piety to summoning? I didn't throw that into the suggestion box yet, just scouting the opinions / give an idea what's going on in my twisted mind. I was mainly thinking about Druids (Animal Companion) and Warlocks (Infinite Balor (Lord) spam), could also apply to familiar.

Warlock Summon VI: -4.0%
Summon Creature IX: -4.0%
Animal Companion: -4.0%
Familiar: -4.0%

Warlock Summon V: -2.0%
Summon Creature VIII: -2.0%

Warlock Summon IV: -1.0%
Summon Creature VII: -1.0%

It would let Druids summon their Animal Companion not only once (twice if already summoned when resting) per rest and give the Warlock a minor trade off.
Mithreas wrote:PC deaths give my life meaning, people.
User avatar
DaTexican
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:22 pm

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by DaTexican »

Id be ok with this. One of my greatest compaints as a druid is losing my animal companion to a server transition or something stupid like that. This way I could resummon it quickly, and at a cost that seems reasonable. This would limit druids in dungeons too cause most druids worship a nature god and you don't see plants kicking around in dungeons very often so you would have to manage it carefully. For warlocks? Got me beat, know nothing of the demon spawns :P
Be Prepared
User avatar
Mayonnaise
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:49 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Mayonnaise »

I'm a bit confused at what this is saying.
User avatar
DaTexican
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:22 pm

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by DaTexican »

As it stands now, Warlocks can cast spells a infinite amount of times because of how they are set up. They can therefore just spam summoning balors at high lvs. He wants your "Peity" score to be tied to this, so that when you summon something (any summon creature spell or summon companion), it pulls from your peity as a resource, thus limiting the amount of spam one could to on a warlock, and giving Druids/wizards a slight buff/debuff in the fact that their companions could be re summoned easily, but if they were say a "Summoner", they would have to manage another resource.
Be Prepared
User avatar
Mayonnaise
Posts: 260
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:49 am
Location: Michigan, USA

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Mayonnaise »

Ah, I see. Thanks!
User avatar
Preacher
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:32 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Preacher »

one large issue I see is that both druids AND warlocks are not summoning their animal companions/demon or devil's based on their faithfulness to a god. Warlocks rp are as numerous as there are warlocks. some even fighting against those they are pacted to. Druids are able to befriend more and more powerful animal companions due to their own power, not their connection to a god.
You have the thanks of a grateful server conglomeration of nations... Thanks!
:) - Jjjerm

Yevon - it would have been safer for me to walk around Wharftown proclaiming Bane to be the god of love and pink frills.
User avatar
Mithradates
Arelith Supporter
Arelith Supporter
Posts: 76
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 2:34 pm

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Mithradates »

Preacher wrote:one large issue I see is that both druids AND warlocks are not summoning their animal companions/demon or devil's based on their faithfulness to a god. Warlocks rp are as numerous as there are warlocks. some even fighting against those they are pacted to. Druids are able to befriend more and more powerful animal companions due to their own power, not their connection to a god.
Yes, I agree with this. A warlock's power isn't connected to the divine, and I don't see a problem with the infinite summons- honestly. The summons are a great supplement to the warlocks other weaknesses. I think the limitations of the animal companions are already notably restricted in their use of once per day.

Source
User avatar
Hunter548
Posts: 1869
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:40 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Hunter548 »

I dislike the idea thematically for warlocks, but some sort of limit on how often they can do it (While still retaining an infinite/day theoretical ability) so that dismissing or disabling the balor is actually a hindrance to the warlock, in PvE or PvP. A cooldown would be the best option to my mind, but maybe some sort of X/day, cast from HP otherwise effect would also be interesting.
UilliamNebel wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:24 pm You're right. Participating in the forums was a mistake. Won't do this again.
Anime Sword Fighter wrote: I have seen far too many miniskirt anime slave girls.
User avatar
Preacher
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:32 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Preacher »

playing a warlock, trust me, getting my summons dismissed or disabled is a HUGE hindrence. and it takes time to cast another one, and often it takes a few seconds for them to respond to frantic commands to defend you lol.

Pvp wise, its the same as with any summons, you ignore them and kill the caster.
Pve wise, well there's all kinds of strategies and if the caster is actually casting anything npc's will often turn on them so they have to be careful. the infinite summons is not an i win button.
You have the thanks of a grateful server conglomeration of nations... Thanks!
:) - Jjjerm

Yevon - it would have been safer for me to walk around Wharftown proclaiming Bane to be the god of love and pink frills.
User avatar
Manabi
Posts: 345
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:04 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Manabi »

I upboat the idea.

The only thing is - how low would it have to be before someone couldn't use a summon/familiar? 50? 0?

I think it's a great idea - but as some have said - it doesn't make sense as far as lore is concerned. But eh- I still think it's a good idea.
Owlbears are the only thing keeping Arelith from the D&D experience.
User avatar
DaTexican
Posts: 437
Joined: Tue Sep 09, 2014 7:22 pm

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by DaTexican »

make it like 5-10% peity cost to do it and you already have created a balancing aspect as no one wants to lose the favor of their god and die because their god didnt save them or something like that :P
Be Prepared
User avatar
Hunter548
Posts: 1869
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 5:40 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Hunter548 »

What about warlocks who don't worship what they're pacted to? What about warlocks who hate the divine in general?
UilliamNebel wrote: Wed Feb 12, 2020 10:24 pm You're right. Participating in the forums was a mistake. Won't do this again.
Anime Sword Fighter wrote: I have seen far too many miniskirt anime slave girls.
User avatar
Thake
Posts: 331
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 11:12 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Thake »

I totally see the nonsens, concerning the lore. So the piety limitation probably doesn't make much sense for the Warlock summoning.

Preacher wrote:playing a warlock, trust me, getting my summons dismissed or disabled is a HUGE hindrence. and it takes time to cast another one, and often it takes a few seconds for them to respond to frantic commands to defend you lol.
Pvp wise, its the same as with any summons, you ignore them and kill the caster.
Pve wise, well there's all kinds of strategies and if the caster is actually casting anything npc's will often turn on them so they have to be careful. the infinite summons is not an i win button.

- I play a Warlock too, and if disabling / dismissal happens, I just summon a new companion.
- I'd say I am far from an awesome pet-master, regarding NWN. But you can easily foretell when your pet's going down. Simply look at the pet's AC and HP, as well as enemy attack rolls, attacks per round and damage and you can pretty precisely tell how many rounds your pet will stay alive. Usually, you don't wait until it's dead, but re-summon it at about 1/3 of HP. The sturdier your summon gets, the easier this is.
- PvP wise, you can always avoid PvP - but ignoring a Balor Lord.. I don't know^^
. PvE wise, infinite summons is definitely an I win button. As long as the summon can deal a blow or two and the enemy doesn't regenerate it, it's only a matter of time.

Don't get me wrong, if that's intended, I'm fine with that. Anyone can play a Warlock and become a Balor spammer :mrgreen:
Mithreas wrote:PC deaths give my life meaning, people.
User avatar
IndifferentPerson
Posts: 649
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 1:46 am
Location: 44th most violent city in the world.

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by IndifferentPerson »

While the summons are very strong and need some looking into, everytime you re-summon them, they're naked of buffs such as bull's, cat's and war cry. Just food for thought.
aaa3
Posts: 170
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 10:10 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by aaa3 »

You can understand the piety drain on warlocks as the willingness of those supplying them powers to do so if they see it is vasted in such huge ammount.
User avatar
DestroyerOTN
Posts: 457
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 3:24 am
Location: IRL, probably mad about it

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by DestroyerOTN »

Fifty cents here: As a fey pact 'lock, I find little reason (to those that'd like power with little involvement) for a -full- warlock to not go fiendish, grab their conjuration focus, and fling bottomless greater pit fiends at city gates en masse: they're the strongest summons currently IG (this -is- including dragon knight), bottomless, and buffed or no, anything's an issue if it repeats.

For PvE (mith's confirmed angle of building attention), this is -wonderful-, where a player may fling a quick escape down, draw away aggro and run for it when stuff looks bad, and is capable of creating a warrior for the party where one otherwise doesn't exist.

For PvP, anyone which claims this isn't overpowered should receive a laugh. Fiendlocks are an immediate "rock and hard place" situation, with Soriek capable of singlehandedly forcing the entire cordor guard to pay a sum exceeding 100 thousand just standing on a bridge with a hostage whom noone really cared about. Focusing looses it's place when you have a summon capable of doing upwards of 70 damage a hit, 3-4 times a round, replaceable at the tip of a hat...

This said, I support fully the prospect of initiating some limitations on these summons, though what one needs to ask is how this may be appropriately balanced with PvE... to this end, piety should work... albeit, the rates need to be high enough of drain to be significant.

Eventually, killing the summon should be a cripple.

EDIT: Should add, while I lend my support to this, no other class or subclass has any need whatsoever to summon-based piety drain. Focus to 'locks alone, I say
Last edited by DestroyerOTN on Tue Oct 14, 2014 12:17 am, edited 2 times in total.
"Playin' nobody, no how since AR 112"
Griefmaker wrote:Personal choices regarding RP which[..] limit a character in some way[…] should in no way be an argument for changing something on the server
Katze
Posts: 143
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 10:37 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Katze »

hmm, would we get unlimited summons to this?
Whatever action one takes IG, con be explained by something logical.
User avatar
Preacher
Posts: 361
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 4:32 am

Re: Linking summoning to piety? (no exceptions)

Post by Preacher »

IndifferentPerson wrote:While the summons are very strong and need some looking into, everytime you re-summon them, they're naked of buffs such as bull's, cat's and war cry. Just food for thought.
as well as any wand buffs, potions or scrolls you used on it
You have the thanks of a grateful server conglomeration of nations... Thanks!
:) - Jjjerm

Yevon - it would have been safer for me to walk around Wharftown proclaiming Bane to be the god of love and pink frills.
Post Reply