Hood Checks

Feedback relating to the other areas of Arelith, also includes old topics.


Moderators: Active Admins, Forum Moderators, Active DMs

User avatar
D4wN
Posts: 868
Joined: Sat Apr 20, 2019 12:46 am
Location: The Netherlands

Re: Hood Checks

Post by D4wN »

Royal Blood wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:56 pm

I think it's worth pointing out there are a lot of ways to get into Cordor. And the Hood Checks are cool in my opinion. It's neat RP opportunity but I don't quite understand why everyone gets so up in arms about pulling a hood down. It seems practical given circumstances and dangers.

If you want to infiltrate Cordor don't walk through the main gate.

That being said, regarding the mechanic, I think it's a clever IC way around the god save mechanic though I doubt that was the intention. Hood Checks have been there for years I believe, before you could even god save a disguise. Even still, I think it remains practical. And all indications so far suggest it's not an exploit but really just an understanding of the mechanics.

The godsave is a save, like that was a close one, not a walk into like an armed patrol and everyone can't recognize you.

This basically. And yeah, maybe write a suggestion on the forum that removing a hood/mask/helmet shouldn't get rid of the CD. Tbh, I didn't even know it did.

Currently playing:
Eduard Helbrecht - Active


Thomas Castemont - Shelved

Liv McDowall - Rolled
Theodor Helbrecht - Rolled
Emma Young - Rolled
Ember Joyleaf-Underfoot - Rolled

User avatar
Diegovog
Posts: 514
Joined: Fri Jan 20, 2017 7:23 pm

Re: Hood Checks

Post by Diegovog »

Scurvy Cur wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:58 pm

Tbh I think we should just remove the disguise godsave, or at the very least, remove the indication that it has been used.

The indicator is very much needed so you can report someone that metagamed your disguise without breaking it. It has happened to me before. It's really important.

That being said, I'm in favor of removing godsave for disguises. It's far too easy to disguise your life away unless you meet dedicated spotters following your around

User avatar
Hazard
Posts: 1876
Joined: Wed Oct 24, 2018 8:27 am

Re: Hood Checks

Post by Hazard »

Alright, then it is easier to make it past a guard with your disguise intact if you do not wear a hood.
No wasted godsave, no doubling up on spotting through bypass of spot CD.

Cover + Disguise = Weak.
No Cover + Disguise = Stronk.

AstralUniverse
Posts: 3110
Joined: Sun Dec 15, 2019 2:54 pm

Re: Hood Checks

Post by AstralUniverse »

Diegovog wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 10:02 pm
Scurvy Cur wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 6:58 pm

Tbh I think we should just remove the disguise godsave, or at the very least, remove the indication that it has been used.

The indicator is very much needed so you can report someone that metagamed your disguise without breaking it. It has happened to me before. It's really important.

That being said, I'm in favor of removing godsave for disguises. It's far too easy to disguise your life away unless you meet dedicated spotters following your around

I'm pretty sure we're talking about removing the indicator that god-save proc happened from disguise breaking attempt, not the indicator that disguise has been broken/unbroken. Although, people could just type -date and check their piety so god-save for disguise would probably need to be removed entirely or not cost piety. Personally, I'm on board. I was protesting against the change that raised the disguise break attempt cooldown from 3 minutes to 10 minutes in first place.

KriegEternal wrote:

Their really missing mords and some minor flavor things.

User avatar
DM Monkey
Posts: 2159
Joined: Sat May 29, 2021 11:39 pm

Re: Hood Checks

Post by DM Monkey »

If I'm reading this right, it's being claimed that:

  1. Someone observes a disguised character who has a hood on. (Let's assume the spot check failed due to godsave)
  2. Hood-check means the disguised character needs to lower their hood. (The claim is that this allows for a reroll due to changing something about their appearance with -hood)
  3. The observer now examines again. (Potentially getting past the godsave now that it has already been triggered)

^ That would be an exploit. We have decent logs that will let us know if this has happened, so players should report specific instances rather than airing problems here on the forum.

The above sounds more like a bug that is not intended, so it should be put into the bug forum following the bug report procedure.

Try harder! Help set a good example of roleplay for the server culture.

User avatar
Queen Titania
Community Manager
Community Manager
Posts: 3443
Joined: Sun Sep 07, 2014 6:44 pm
Location: The Seeliecourt singing with Tinkerbell

Re: Hood Checks

Post by Queen Titania »

Xerah wrote: Thu Dec 21, 2023 4:01 pm

I’ve never had a character who lives in stealth/disguise/full cover.

Hood checks have always seemed like stick based roleplay. Stories are much more likely to come out of carrot based roleplay. I’ve avoided them as a player, if I’m involved in the cordor guard or not.

Some people mentioned “papers please”. For an example, get the leader/gov agents to issue “papers” and actually ask for those instead. Maybe they are give special papers that says they are an elevated member of society (because they are a wizard obv). This seems much more carrot based than hood checks to break disguises.

I agree that this sort of route to take is a good suggestion.

Please don't feed my sister.
Locked