Arelith

So, the new HAK bisons, located in the foothills between Bendir's riverside and the lower foothills have little polygon dongers on their models. Might want to do some greater curating on these new creatures before launching them into the module.
(I didn't embed the image on account of the bison bits)
https://i.imgur.com/s1BaBMY.png

Haha, well in theory that could be a little tuft of fur, but either way I'm sure someone with Blender could easily snip the offending... unit.

This seems fine. Animals often have little dongers hanging down, when they're boy animals. Cows, horses, dogs. I know we're supposedly a family friendly server (+ torture), but pretending like animals don't have little dongers seems a bit prudish.

Edit to add: "Bison dong" is my favorite thread title of all time.

Subutai wrote: Mon Sep 16, 2019 4:32 pm This seems fine. Animals often have little dongers hanging down, when they're boy animals. Cows, horses, dogs. I know we're supposedly a family friendly server (+ torture), but pretending like animals don't have little dongers seems a bit prudish.

Edit to add: "Bison dong" is my favorite thread title of all time.

I made a bug report about it because it really stands out on Arelith where nothing else like this exists.

Ummm... So? Sure in a PG13 setting genitalia on PCs or sentient characters might not be preferable, but this is an animal. I'm pretty sure the average 13 year old can grasp the fact that animals have genitals.

I'm pretty sure that's the back right leg.

Do you get upset every time you go to the supermarket too?





I've never seen anatomically correct animals be considered a breach of pg13, anywhere.

Party in the forest at midnight wrote: Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:18 pm CENSORED

Please remove this disgusting bovine pornography from my computer.

I personally don't feel it's violating Arelith's PG13 stance at all.

But on the other hand, I also agree it seems a bit out of place.
It's just one of those things NWN mobs have never had, and NWN isn't trying to be a hyper realistic game, so it falls into that category of just being unnecessary and a bit off theme.

I suspect it's something that slipped in accidentally.
Either way though, I'm not going to lose sleep over it.

back leg not dong

Party in the forest at midnight wrote: Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:18 pm Do you get upset every time you go to the supermarket too?
I've never seen anatomically correct animals be considered a breach of pg13, anywhere.

No, but counterpoint.

Why though?

We have the choice to implement animals with penises or not. We haven't done so until now, and I don't really see a reason for why we should start. It's weird, looks silly in NWN graphics and reminds me of that one time I had a look at Sinfar.

Ebonstar wrote: Mon Sep 16, 2019 7:31 pm back leg not dong

Not back leg, you can see the back leg slightly behind the front back leg.

It will be removed; it really doesn't fit the model and makes it look bad.

You noticed only one part, not the testicles that were poorly designed at the back of it.

God so many prudes here lol. You think teens never seen a dong?... cause if you do i got news for you, they have.

Also why are people spending so much time scrutinizing and commenting on them... its rather weird to me lol.

Chill pills, people.

Handled and closed.