Caster Classes CL against Dispelling is a Disaster.
Posted: Sun Aug 21, 2022 7:17 pm
It is just my opinion but i consider the fact that so many classes with acess to magic are ''covered'' when it comes to dipping very unfair especially with how sorcerers and wizards are not. And even if they do take Arcane Defense Abjuration their CL is still below a barbarian drinking a potion. You could have a wizard , dedicated caster wizard specialized enchanter who's zoo spells are easier to dispell than some barbarian's potion. Spellswords are covered when it comes to dipping even if they dont really need to dip , so are hexblades and warpriests , bards even! Shaman get ''covered'' for their dips aswell! So do Paladins , Rangers. Having a dip on a sorcerer or a wizard is a necessity that i think they are getting both unfairly punished for while many other classes stay safe. And 2 feats for a 2 cl increase against dispells? Practicioned spellcaster from nwn 2 makes way more sense. The way it stands now in my opinion the ''mages'' or rather just sorcerer and wizard are extremely punished just for doing what they need to do anyway. To think that a dipped wizard who spent 2 feats improving his cl against dispells STILL has weaker zoo spells than a mundane barbarian is bit insane to me. Not to mention i feel like not everyone should be forced to play an abjurer just to get normal CL.