New Spellsword Building Thread
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:48 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
It also encourages the supremely suboptimal aesthetic choice of single-kama monks.
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
I checked this 5 minutes ago on a new 3 lvl SS(+1ab bonus) and on old 8 lvl SS(+2ab bonus).Astral wrote:Yes. Except that you still get the bonus in epics, for now.dallion43 wrote: Meaning it is no longer a magical bonus, but a standard 3/4 BaB ab?
So Bob takes 16 wizard pre epic, he gets 12 bab from them, and then he goes 4 fighter and gets to 16 bab at lvl 20. Then Bob takes 7 more wizard lvls and gets +2 ab (that does count to the cap, unlike the bab) that shouldnt exist.
Both +1 and +2 are included in the +20 cap = magical bonus, and both new and old spellswords bonuses in the log look identical, respective to SS lvl, including the description for numbers of attacks.
Maybe this wasn't implemented yet live or I misunderstood something?
Last edited by dallion43 on Sat Dec 16, 2017 5:14 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
It's still magical AB. However your AB/ APR should work like a proper 3/4 class.
So a level 4 spellsword level 3 fighter should have 2APR and 7 AB (used to be 1 APR 7 AB)
A level 3 spellsword/level 4 fighter should have 2APR and 7 AB (used to be 1 APR 6 AB)
So a level 4 spellsword level 3 fighter should have 2APR and 7 AB (used to be 1 APR 7 AB)
A level 3 spellsword/level 4 fighter should have 2APR and 7 AB (used to be 1 APR 6 AB)
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Kirito, is +1 AB at levels 23 and 27 of spellsword still a thing? And if it is, is it staying that way?
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Was the monk class fixed for all spellswords or only those made after the changes? I have a SS pre-change and don't know if monk is still ruined for him.
\
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
prechange SS 27/ (with working) monk 3 sounds terrifying lol
Last edited by Freyason on Sat Dec 16, 2017 10:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
It's a str half ork that's going to use a quarter staff. So I can get two weapon fighting and stuff and flurry and keep dex at 8. Using transmutation foci to shore up my stats.
It's a good build in the sense that I can hit like 70 ac and have an obscene number of attacks per round and overwhelming damage. I just need to know if monk was fixed for all spellswords or just post nerf ones.
It's a good build in the sense that I can hit like 70 ac and have an obscene number of attacks per round and overwhelming damage. I just need to know if monk was fixed for all spellswords or just post nerf ones.
\
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
After more toying around with the numbers, I see that a spellsword can abuse the magical ab in epics for up to 3 ab. Meaning a spellsword can reach 24 bab by lvl 30 if they take 14 SS pre-epic and 9 more in epics, which isnt a particularly bad level progression on its own and will put you 1 bab below the WM. THIS is broken, guys. I hope you understand that. It's gonna look silly.
Currently playing: Seth Xylo
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
I'm not sure I understand you?Astral wrote:After more toying around with the numbers, I see that a spellsword can abuse the magical ab in epics for up to 3 ab. Meaning a spellsword can reach 24 bab by lvl 30 if they take 14 SS pre-epic and 9 more in epics, which isnt a particularly bad level progression on its own and will put you 1 bab below the WM. THIS is broken, guys. I hope you understand that. It's gonna look silly.
14 SS pre epic gives AB 10, (BAB 7 +3 ) 6 fighter gives 16 AB / 4APR pre epic. (BAB 13 + 3)
9 SS+1fighter post epic gives AB 6 ( 5 BAB + 1) for a total of 22... this is 3 less than a fighter...
And weapon masters get even higher?
Also clerics get 15 + 5 with the option of +5 with spell for 25 same as straight fighter
-
- Posts: 1589
- Joined: Fri Oct 06, 2017 5:20 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
I mean, the lore of the the spellsword is that you've mastered both Arcane, and martial skills. You should just be the best of both. It's not an easy feat.
\
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
You take 14 spellsword for 10 bab, 6 fighter for 6 more, so far we're on 16. You get 5 more from flat bab progression in epics for 21 (which is all you should get) and then you also get +3 ab from taking lvls 15th to 23rd spellsowrd in epic lvls. So that's 24 total. 23 if you take 16 spellsword 4 fighter and 7 more in epics. Its, in my opinion, significantly higher than all the rest of the 3/4 classes who take 4 fighter pre-epic.Kirito wrote:I'm not sure I understand you?Astral wrote:After more toying around with the numbers, I see that a spellsword can abuse the magical ab in epics for up to 3 ab. Meaning a spellsword can reach 24 bab by lvl 30 if they take 14 SS pre-epic and 9 more in epics, which isnt a particularly bad level progression on its own and will put you 1 bab below the WM. THIS is broken, guys. I hope you understand that. It's gonna look silly.
14 SS pre epic gives AB 10, (BAB 7 +3 ) 6 fighter gives 16 AB / 4APR pre epic. (BAB 13 + 3)
9 SS+1fighter post epic gives AB 6 ( 5 BAB + 1) for a total of 22... this is 3 less than a fighter...
And weapon masters get even higher?
Also clerics get 15 + 5 with the option of +5 with spell for 25 same as straight fighter
Currently playing: Seth Xylo
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
You don't get the +2 for level 15 and 19 (just like any other 3/4 class)Astral wrote:
You take 14 spellsword for 10 bab, 6 fighter for 6 more, so far we're on 16. You get 5 more from flat bab progression in epics for 21 (which is all you should get) and then you also get +3 ab from taking lvls 15th to 23rd spellsowrd in epic lvls. So that's 24 total. 23 if you take 16 spellsword 4 fighter and 7 more in epics. Its, in my opinion, significantly higher than all the rest of the 3/4 classes who take 4 fighter pre-epic.
So you're 1 higher than bard/rogue and 3 lower than cleric
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:09 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Alright, so, for those of us who don't want to single-wield a kama. What've yall got for the new spellsword setup?
Clerics are just socially acceptable warlocks.The devil does not need any more advocates
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Kirito wrote:You don't get the +2 for level 15 and 19 (just like any other 3/4 class)Astral wrote:
You take 14 spellsword for 10 bab, 6 fighter for 6 more, so far we're on 16. You get 5 more from flat bab progression in epics for 21 (which is all you should get) and then you also get +3 ab from taking lvls 15th to 23rd spellsowrd in epic lvls. So that's 24 total. 23 if you take 16 spellsword 4 fighter and 7 more in epics. Its, in my opinion, significantly higher than all the rest of the 3/4 classes who take 4 fighter pre-epic.
So you're 1 higher than bard/rogue and 3 lower than cleric
Okay, I was unaware that 15th and 19th wont give you magical ab if taken in epics. So my bad there. For a moment, I thought I might take a late game 3 spellsword dip instead of rogue just for the extra ab on my monk paladin
Currently playing: Seth Xylo
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
It's okay that was part of the reason the change went in, to correct the epic AB from non epic levelsAstral wrote:Kirito wrote:You don't get the +2 for level 15 and 19 (just like any other 3/4 class)Astral wrote:
You take 14 spellsword for 10 bab, 6 fighter for 6 more, so far we're on 16. You get 5 more from flat bab progression in epics for 21 (which is all you should get) and then you also get +3 ab from taking lvls 15th to 23rd spellsowrd in epic lvls. So that's 24 total. 23 if you take 16 spellsword 4 fighter and 7 more in epics. Its, in my opinion, significantly higher than all the rest of the 3/4 classes who take 4 fighter pre-epic.
So you're 1 higher than bard/rogue and 3 lower than cleric
Okay, I was unaware that 15th and 19th wont give you magical ab if taken in epics. So my bad there. For a moment, I thought I might take a late game 3 spellsword dip instead of rogue just for the extra ab on my monk paladin
-
- Posts: 150
- Joined: Thu Nov 16, 2017 11:16 pm
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Could Wizard 21/Ranger9 work on a half orc using double sided axe? The only issues I can think of are relatively low number of feats and a bit awkward leveling, since both 21W and 9R are important levels.
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:48 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Are you looking for a dex or str setup?One Two Three Five wrote:Alright, so, for those of us who don't want to single-wield a kama. What've yall got for the new spellsword setup?
-
- Posts: 1139
- Joined: Sat Mar 18, 2017 7:09 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Strength, I think. I've only run dexers so far.
Clerics are just socially acceptable warlocks.The devil does not need any more advocates
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:48 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Zavandar's got what is probably the most stable strength build posted in the previous page of the thread, here:
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=13550&start=150
You can run this reasonably as a dwarf, focusing in battleaxe (and using a waraxe instead, feat transferrance, etc.) and skipping on exotic prof.
You can also run it as a sun elf, also skipping exotic prof, and either going for a moonblade or a scim/rapier.
The dwarf version is marginally stronger than the human, the elf version marginally weaker, but all three should be fairly solid.
viewtopic.php?f=36&t=13550&start=150
You can run this reasonably as a dwarf, focusing in battleaxe (and using a waraxe instead, feat transferrance, etc.) and skipping on exotic prof.
You can also run it as a sun elf, also skipping exotic prof, and either going for a moonblade or a scim/rapier.
The dwarf version is marginally stronger than the human, the elf version marginally weaker, but all three should be fairly solid.
-
- Posts: 800
- Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:25 pm
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Alternatively, you can be heroically patient by skipping EWF and wielding some other weapon until you get the monk levels, thus opening up another feat.Zavandar wrote:Alrighty. After mulling it over for a bit and talking to some people, I believe that this is the best monk variant there is:
Works with most other races, as they can just drop arcane defense: abjuration.
I think the math can speak for itself. This build seems a little bit on the super strong side..
This can look cool if you have the right outfit. If it's wearing that dorky monk clothing with no covering on the shoulders then yes, it will look stupid.Scurvy Cur wrote:It also encourages the supremely suboptimal aesthetic choice of single-kama monks.
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
and WF...High Primate wrote: Alternatively, you can be heroically patient by skipping EWF and wielding some other weapon until you get the monk levels, thus opening up another feat.
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
I might suggest taking SF and GSF transmutation at 1 and 3 for infinite burning hands, that sure made the first few awkward spellsword levels easy for me..
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
@High Primate & Freyason
Waiting until epics to take monk could, in theory, save you from taking exotic.
The problem is budgeting your feats. How would you move the two pre-epic feats you use for wf: kama and exotic into epics?
Waiting until epics to take monk could, in theory, save you from taking exotic.
The problem is budgeting your feats. How would you move the two pre-epic feats you use for wf: kama and exotic into epics?
Intelligence is too important
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
Right, just saying you'd have to hold on WF not just EWF. Didn't look if it was possible, but if it is it would be good build for masochists.
-
- Posts: 1311
- Joined: Tue Jan 27, 2015 3:48 am
Re: New Spellsword Building Thread
It's probably going to come out worse by a good margin, actually. From my tinkering with Spellsword, they usually have plenty of pre epic feats, and can afford the exotic prof, but blowing an epic feat on a build that gets a lot of mileage out of:
EMA
EWF
Askin
Eprow
ESF: Disc
ESF: Trans
ESF: Abj
And probably already lacks the room to take all of them is a very painful proposition.
EMA
EWF
Askin
Eprow
ESF: Disc
ESF: Trans
ESF: Abj
And probably already lacks the room to take all of them is a very painful proposition.