a neutral feedback thread for possible class hak

Feedback relating to the other areas of Arelith, also includes old topics.


Moderators: Active Admins, Active DMs, Forum Moderators

User avatar
Baron Saturday
Posts: 2364
Joined: Mon Sep 08, 2014 4:34 am

Re: a neutral feedback thread for possible class hak

Post by Baron Saturday »

It should probably be noted that non-good paladins makes Paladin/PM and Paladin/Warlock a possibility, and it should probably be considered if this is something we want.
Rolled: Helene d'Arque, Sara Lyonall
Shelved: Kels Vetian, Cin ys'Andalis, Saul Haidt
Playing: Oshe Jordain
User avatar
Ebonstar
Posts: 1471
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:17 pm
Location: you may not see me but i see you

Re: a neutral feedback thread for possible class hak

Post by Ebonstar »

dug even deeper and found the other article mentioned in issue #39 of Dragon

the missing alignment in the list the CE Anti Paladin

the article jumps from page 8-9 to page 50 for the conclusion


and again this is not a blackguard

https://www.annarchive.com/files/Drmg039.pdf
Yes I can sign
User avatar
Cybernet21
Posts: 673
Joined: Mon Nov 07, 2016 6:18 pm

Re: a neutral feedback thread for possible class hak

Post by Cybernet21 »

But in every definition of BG i could find says they are known as anti-paladins though.

And as i said before,sure paladins and BG's are mechanically different but i see that as a good thing.

EDIT:Just finished reading that and the NWN/Arelith BG actually has a lot of that already (not disease immunity i think but they do get contagion) except Lay on Hands. It also has different things such as summoning.
My family were all knights,but none protected those who cannot fight for themselves.They all cared about their noble status more than anything else.I would be a true knight,i would train on the ways of the paladin -Arcavius Ryde
User avatar
Ebonstar
Posts: 1471
Joined: Wed Feb 18, 2015 2:17 pm
Location: you may not see me but i see you

Re: a neutral feedback thread for possible class hak

Post by Ebonstar »

Cybernet21 wrote: Thu Dec 06, 2018 10:06 am But in every definition of BG i could find says they are known as anti-paladins though.

And as i said before,sure paladins and BG's are mechanically different but i see that as a good thing.

EDIT:Just finished reading that and the NWN/Arelith BG actually has a lot of that already (not disease immunity i think but they do get contagion) except Lay on Hands. It also has different things such as summoning.
that means Arelith BG can go back to being a prestige class for the dark side like CoT is for the Light side. But it makes it so you actually have to be that dark paladin before hand and not just a so so bad guy

I see BG right now being taken without penalties of having to be the Fiend its supposed to be pure corrupt and utterly evil serving dark powers. Right Now its i get cool smite things but i can be neutral again tomorrow
Yes I can sign
Post Reply