Language Synergy Suggestion
Moderators: Active Admins, Forum Moderators, Active DMs
Language Synergy Suggestion
viewtopic.php?f=15&p=241178#p241178
Original post ^
I like the iea of language synergy generally but I felt it worth noting that Infernal, Celestial, and Abyssal are all related languages and should probably in fact have synergy instead of "antisynergy".
Original post ^
I like the iea of language synergy generally but I felt it worth noting that Infernal, Celestial, and Abyssal are all related languages and should probably in fact have synergy instead of "antisynergy".
Irongron wrote:To step beyond any threshold, having left that place richer than one found it, is the finest legacy anyone can have.
Irongron wrote:With a value of 100+ one can milk chickens
-
- Posts: 1457
- Joined: Thu Mar 29, 2018 4:55 pm
Re: Language Synergy Suggestion
I dislike the idea of anti-synergy. Learning languages is already a chore, I don't like the idea of it taking even longer than it already does. It would mostly impact drow if they want to learn elven, it's like a really weird drow nerf.
Re: Language Synergy Suggestion
I do not see a point in language anti-synergy, it seems just a non-sequitur. But I like a lot the idea of synergy, and I want to add also that Undercommon has good synergy with Xanalress and to a lesser extent Dwarven and Gnomish.
Re: Language Synergy Suggestion
Synergy seems neat, mostly because it's less time spent trying to learn a language.
Anti synergy just means people get all three languages to 99% before finishing them.
Anti synergy just means people get all three languages to 99% before finishing them.
Irongron wrote: [...] the super-secret Arelith development roadmap is a post apocalyptic wasteland populated with competing tribes of hand-bombard wielding techno-giants, and strewn with the bones of long dead elves.
So we're very much on track.