True Flame Spell Selection
Moderators: Active DMs, Forum Moderators
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
That's my take on it.
-
- Arelith Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 1567
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 9:14 am
- Location: Mechanics Dungeon
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
But let's indulge the thought for a bit -
For resources like coal that has a 90% drop chance:
A TF wielding the tools could potentially hit 249 damage on a node and then surpass 26 damage required to get the extra tick, but sometimes it doesn't work out that way. The uncertainty here in melee attacks isn't in the TF's favor compared to calculated spell damage that a TF can easily achieve.
So we're looking at:
0.95 * 10 = 9.5 resources per node (didn't go past the 275 threshold)
0.95 * 11 = 10.45 resources per node (went past the 275 threshold)
or
0.9 * 12 = 10.8 resources per node (300+ threshold via scorching ray + ice dagger combo)
0.9 * 13 = 11.7 resources per node (325+ threshold via cone of cold + ice dagger combo)
On average the TF will gain more with the Scorching Ray combo or gets better with the Cone of Cold combo.
Here's the comprehensive spreadsheet with the average drop rate:
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/ ... sp=sharing
For these resources, it starts to even out at a 20% base drop chance (assuming the wielder is meek and doesn't attack as often, a TF, for example)
For resources such as adamantine, it'll be better if one uses the resource tools if the 5% bonus chance is present, which it currently isn't.
Another thing to keep in mind is that attacking with TF's BAB (2 or 3 depending on if the character had full BAB class dips such as hex, BG, or paladin pre-epic), let's assume 3 APR, but 4 with dual-wield.
Average of 36 damage per attack, which results in roughly around 2 rounds per node clear time.
Auto-quicken Scorching Ray combo takes 2 rounds per node clear time.
AQ Cone of Cold combo takes 3 rounds per node clear time. (or 1.5 rounds for 10 ticks instead of 13)
The different clear times will result in what economists call an "Opportunity Cost" where the longer one dwells in an area, the slower the gatherer gets to the next node. And that could mean a couple of things: the next node being cleared by others, the overall clear time takes longer to complete, etc.
I'd say there is maybe some merit to using the resource tools iff the 5% bonus chance is present, which, again, it currently isn't, and the TF bothers buffing up the strength score with zoo spell, casting elemental weapon on the gathering tools and dual-wield said tools.
P.S.: "iff" stands for "if and only if"
For you, the day Kenji overhauled your class was the most important day of your life.
But for me, it was Tuesday. To-do list
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
When I look at my notes about TF and evocation spells, I had a few comments on my own:
Cloud of Bewilderment:
Should be conjuration by SRD.
Sound Lance:
By RAW sonic damage should be 1 dice lower than other elemental spells of the same level. Here it is one dice higher and party-friendly. It should sit on the 5th tier. The SRD version is a single target, not an AOE.
Wall of Fire/Ice:
Empower makes it unpleasant, as it should only empower 2d6, not the whole dmg (by the book). Other than that, stacking walls should be looked into.
Ice Storm:
It should hold save vs movement decrease, but on Arelith it is compensated with more DMG, which is fine since Warlocks use it as well.
Darkbolt:
TF could have +15 Dart removed from AB bonus, preferably by capping the max bonus from items to +5.
Perhaps it should scale slower (like per 3CL, not 2CL), by the time one can cast it, it is already at 70-80% scaling.
Delayed Blast Fireball:
This is a weird one, as I do not use it on my TFs and I haven't seen it being used. Perhaps there is some hidden gem to it?
Incendiary Cloud:
Should be conjuration by SRD.
Sunburst:
According to SRD: Should work also on fungi, mold, oozes, and slimes as if they were undead, and should dispel the darkness in the area of effect.
Iceberg:
I do not know if it is just me, but the spell VFS makes NWN engine and FPS go BRRRRR, perhaps VFX could be updated to be less hardcore - nevertheless, I like it as it is now.
Greater Ruin
Hellball
Evocation should not hit with positive, negative, divine, etc.
Perhaps it could be re-adjusted and placed as magic.
-
- Arelith Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 1567
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 9:14 am
- Location: Mechanics Dungeon
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Feel free to post this to the suggestion box when it's open. For now, let's keep the discussion focused on TFs rather than generic spell effects that affect the entire spellcasting community rather than TFs alone.Dreams wrote: ↑Sun Feb 21, 2021 8:42 amI think spells really should at least have a toggle for whether you want them to be area destroying or not. Some spells damage fixtures, some spells don't. All spells that normally would SHOULD do this, as it is a risk of casting that particular spell. If that's too much of an inconvenience for people to learn the placement of spells, then having a toggle could help a great deal.
While I agree with a few of these, the majority of these should be in the feedback section.
The purpose of this thread is to discuss which available spells to TF should be picked for what purpose and what to do with said spells rather than turning it into a suggestion thread on what to do to the spells.
Except this one:
DBF is indeed a hidden gem and often underutilized. It's also borderline broken when stacked with TF's infinicast, making the spell ideal to set up kill zones for PvE purposes and a zoning tool for PvP purposes, if the TF is allowed time to set it up.
It's only tricky because communication with party members is key when it comes to setting up DBF. Setting up multiple DBF to one-shot bosses can be a crucial tool for solo TFs.
It's even more powerful with Empower Spells meta magic feat and is one of the reasons why Empower Spells is just as good a pick as Maximize Spells for TFs.
For you, the day Kenji overhauled your class was the most important day of your life.
But for me, it was Tuesday. To-do list
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
-
- Arelith Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 1567
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 9:14 am
- Location: Mechanics Dungeon
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
For you, the day Kenji overhauled your class was the most important day of your life.
But for me, it was Tuesday. To-do list
-
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:41 pm
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
-
- Arelith Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 1567
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 9:14 am
- Location: Mechanics Dungeon
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
While the TF will technically deal more damage with walls of fire over 8 rounds (a lot can happen in that time), DBF will be able to deal from 475 (if all are, unluckily enough, ref saved) all the way up to 1615 damage within 1 round or 2 if aptly placed without requiring the TFs to kite as much. Hence why it can be the ideal spell to deal with high DPS bosses that the TF doesn't want prolonged exposure to.
The downside is DBF will eat up around 10 to 20 components. But personally, I'd pick safety over hassle if I knew the boss mobs aren't high on ref save and have evasion. It's not something to be done every pull, of course, but an option for TFs for encounters that have higher stakes.
For you, the day Kenji overhauled your class was the most important day of your life.
But for me, it was Tuesday. To-do list
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:41 pm
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Most AoE's can't be stacked, why is this one still an exception?
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
-
- Posts: 575
- Joined: Sat Mar 25, 2017 6:41 pm
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Wall of fire. This is your best defensive spell as you can cast 3-4 of them before starting the fight and then anything charging into melee range will have to run over them taking damage that could well kill them.
There has been some debate here about dark bolt but i stand by it being one of a true flames best disabling spells as it can hit up to seven targets dazing them for a round, the damage off it is pretty good also against a single target plus it can target objects which most evocation spells don't.
Ice Storm. The best rogue killer as it ignores evasion and does 90 damage maximised to everything in it's AoE.
IGMS for clear reasons of it being the best damage spell in the game vs single targets.
Personally i love Sunburst incendairy cloud hits an area for more damage and inflicts blind while they are in it, but Sunburst inflicts permanent blindness on a failed reflex save this means the spawns don't just walk out of the AoE like they do with Incen Cloud but have to stand around blind while you kill them.
Scorching Ray i use for mining it's not the most optimal option but does the job well enough.
Bigbys line of spells they are all fairly good but forceful hand is very good and doesn't cost spell components to use i use the others a lot in groups when a big target is an issue for them being able to stun/disable targets is a huge help even better than raw damage in a lot of cases.
Great Thunderclap.
This is the single best CC spell in the game every target has to make three saves and you can stand there spamming it while hasted every round and hurl a damage spell as well.
Elemental Shield.for it's 50% damage reduction to fire and frost.
Everything else is optional. the spells i use are Great Thunderclap, Icestrom, Firebrand, IGMS, Elemental/lightings shield, Mordenkens sword, Scorching ray, Sunburst, Incendiary cloud, Wall of fire/ice, various Bigbies depending on target, Darkbolt for CC and direct damage on objects, and once in a blue moon i cast fireball when trolls are to far away to kill with fire brand.
Every once in awhile when i want to be different i cast meteor swarm or something different but ultimately it's just for flair the spells i listed are IMO the best ones to use.
-
- Arelith Platinum Supporter
- Posts: 1567
- Joined: Mon May 14, 2018 9:14 am
- Location: Mechanics Dungeon
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
So you've tried it in one scenario (which also happens to be undead) and your conclusion is it'd be the same for everything else.Airport Proximity Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 1:09 amYou only "need" 3 stacked empowered fire/ice walls for the vast majority of enemies you'll be fighting at level 30. Beyond that is overkill, and a level 16 true flame can solo moradel(bel?) the vampire . Very easily. She won't even hit you once if you do it right. Stacking higher than 4 empowered firewalls is just an exercise in wasting your own time
This mindset is a waste of everyone's time if you've come to posit your opinion without an open mind.
This much is true, the detection for DBF is very finicky and the Wall spells are consistent and good at dealing with large numbers of mobs and choke points.
For you, the day Kenji overhauled your class was the most important day of your life.
But for me, it was Tuesday. To-do list
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:42 am
- Location: UTC-7
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Likely still more efficient to use specialized tools on stuff that has low % rolls per tick, like ruby, emerald, diamond, adamantine, gold, etcetera, but this also has the benefit of limiting pack weight and pack space by NOT carrying a mining pick/Gem hammer.
"That's not true! I can totally be suffered!"
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:41 pm
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
No, no no no. Thats an example of a "hard" fight that's completely trivialized by TF, and I've played TF enough to know how much is and isn't overkill for keeping yourself alive when you inevitably aggro enemies. For the vast majority of mob fights, 3-4 empowered fire/ice walls is enough.Kenji wrote: ↑Mon Mar 15, 2021 9:38 amSo you've tried it in one scenario (which also happens to be undead) and your conclusion is it'd be the same for everything else.Airport Proximity Jesus wrote: ↑Sat Mar 06, 2021 1:09 amYou only "need" 3 stacked empowered fire/ice walls for the vast majority of enemies you'll be fighting at level 30. Beyond that is overkill, and a level 16 true flame can solo moradel(bel?) the vampire . Very easily. She won't even hit you once if you do it right. Stacking higher than 4 empowered firewalls is just an exercise in wasting your own time
This mindset is a waste of everyone's time if you've come to posit your opinion without an open mind.
This much is true, the detection for DBF is very finicky and the Wall spells are consistent and good at dealing with large numbers of mobs and choke points.
People are talking about how ridiculously OP doing a certain thing that TF can do is when it's a waste of time to stack more than that many walls- and are also leaving out how wet paper weak a TF actually is. TF can do some ridiculous numbers, but you're constantly at risk of 4+ mobs b lining for your 22 ac tops(if you're a ranger TF, of course) tasty tasty hitbox. TFs are also terrible in pvp to my experience and from what other people have told me. The things they CAN do looks impressive, but they're extremely stifled by how one-trick-pony they are
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:42 am
- Location: UTC-7
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Yeah, gust of wind can blow away a lot of what they place, but not everything in the arsenal, and if you have time to prepare in advance, it forces opponents to stop and remember to gust before they can charge.
"That's not true! I can totally be suffered!"
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:41 pm
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Bunnysmack wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 3:31 pmAnything that can spam endless layered and scattered persistent AOE effects can be used to incredible tactical benefit. Just don't place the kill walls/clouds on-or-around transitions, and a team fight TF can really shape where battle ends up occurring.
Yeah, gust of wind can blow away a lot of what they place, but not everything in the arsenal, and if you have time to prepare in advance, it forces opponents to stop and remember to gust before they can charge.
You're also not allowed to stack fire/ice walls in pvp. You have to individually spread them out as a courtesy thing and you can be punished for stacking them in pvp.
Also yea that's the stipulation- if anyone realizes you're a TF you're just dead on the spot and most people will. TF as a build is also fairly uncommon because of how jenky they are to seriously play, and you'll usually only see 1-2 around at any given time. Everyone will want you in their party for dungeon content, but also, everyone will now know you're the TF thats aligned with x faction, so a lot of people will go into fights with the knowledge that you're the duder to smack
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:42 am
- Location: UTC-7
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Wait, really? Huh. I mean, I haven't actually played as a TF before (and no other arcane caster I've played ever had enough spell slots to properly make use of such a tactic in PvP), but I've yet to hear that ruling anywhere.Airport Proximity Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:21 pmYou're also not allowed to stack fire/ice walls in pvp. You have to individually spread them out as a courtesy thing and you can be punished for stacking them in pvp.
Seems a weird rule, considering an area dispel can immediately invalidate all the set up, and the only caster capable of pulling it off is the glassiest of vulnerable cannons.
However, if that is actually the opinion of the team, I'll make sure TFs I play with in the future know about that rule.
"That's not true! I can totally be suffered!"
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
Until I'm told by a DM or pointed to a public post where they clarify this I'm going to presume that's a shadow rule, seeing as the wall spells were deliberately excluded from the changes made to other persistent AOE's and stacking.Airport Proximity Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:21 pmYou're also not allowed to stack fire/ice walls in pvp. You have to individually spread them out as a courtesy thing and you can be punished for stacking them in pvp.
-
- Arelith Silver Supporter
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Aug 09, 2018 5:42 am
- Location: UTC-7
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
"That's not true! I can totally be suffered!"
-
- Posts: 142
- Joined: Mon Oct 15, 2018 6:41 pm
Re: True Flame Spell Selection
I suppose it wasn't a DM who told me that, but it sounds about right to me. It's very deceptive and a lot of builds can just walk over one fire wall. It's got to do with the trap stacking rule, tooBunnysmack wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:29 pmWait, really? Huh. I mean, I haven't actually played as a TF before (and no other arcane caster I've played ever had enough spell slots to properly make use of such a tactic in PvP), but I've yet to hear that ruling anywhere.Airport Proximity Jesus wrote: ↑Tue Mar 16, 2021 4:21 pmYou're also not allowed to stack fire/ice walls in pvp. You have to individually spread them out as a courtesy thing and you can be punished for stacking them in pvp.
Seems a weird rule, considering an area dispel can immediately invalidate all the set up, and the only caster capable of pulling it off is the glassiest of vulnerable cannons.
However, if that is actually the opinion of the team, I'll make sure TFs I play with in the future know about that rule.