Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

You have questions? We may have answers.

Moderators: Forum Moderators, Active DMs

Post Reply
User avatar
Rooshy41
Posts: 159
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2017 5:42 am
Location: Eastern US

Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Rooshy41 »

The thought just occurred to me: "Does calling a spell by its name in-character sound weird?"

I mean, lets take for example: "Greater Magic Weapon"

For one, it sounds more like a noun than anything. Almost as if you're referring to a weapon that is more magical than other magical weapons. Not a spell that puts a buff onto a sword that makes it magically powerful.

Am I the only one who finds this odd?

On an aside, I don't mean that everyone should change how they RP. I just think its odd.
"Look! It's an intelligent talking bear, it must be normal. Let's make it pay taxes."

https://xkcd.com/1223/
User avatar
Cortex
Posts: 3553
Joined: Tue Mar 24, 2015 10:12 pm

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Cortex »

No.
:)
User avatar
Iceborn
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 3471
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Iceborn »

???
Wait, let me ring my scryphone and ask Mordenkainen why did he call "sword" his antimagic golem.
*Riiiiiiings*
*Cli-clank*
*Wizard talk*
*Clank*
He called me a *****, and he told me to call it whatever I want if I don't like it.

Don't click weird links, kiddos.

User avatar
High Primate
Posts: 800
Joined: Thu Sep 11, 2014 5:25 pm

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by High Primate »

Language.
Some builds I've worked on (not recommended):
Charisma Battlecleric
"E-Dodge Brycer"
Black Wendigo
Posts: 663
Joined: Sat Sep 13, 2014 4:09 am

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Black Wendigo »

I think it is perfectly IC to call a spell by it's d and d name, if your char is intelligent enough to know a lot about magic. For instance a mage who has studied magic all his life would know the "correct" name for spells, ingredients, components and all things magical. But an ignorant barbarian from a tribe would not know that, since he's not educated in the magical arts.

But basically, yeah. Call the spells what you want.
Sab1
Posts: 1269
Joined: Fri Oct 17, 2014 8:44 pm

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Sab1 »

Iceborn wrote:???
Wait, let me ring my scryphone and ask Mordenkainen why did he call "sword" his antimagic golem.
*Riiiiiiings*
*Cli-clank*
*Wizard talk*
*Clank*
He called me a *****, and he told me to call it whatever I want if I don't like it.
Wait what?

Why shouldn't you call it by the name, after all if your spellcraft is high enough it even comes up and says what being cast. So if that's the official name, no reason you wouldn't know it.
Last edited by Sab1 on Sat Apr 01, 2017 1:53 pm, edited 1 time in total.
User avatar
The GrumpyCat
Dungeon Master
Dungeon Master
Posts: 7110
Joined: Sun Jan 18, 2015 5:47 pm

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by The GrumpyCat »

So long as you ID them with your spellcraft skill, or another character tells you what they are- then no it's not metagaming.
That said making up different names for them might be cool? Maybe your mage is from somewhere exotic where they call Magic Missile 'Six Falling Star Attack!' or something. But that's just flavour.
This too shall pass.

(I now have a DM Discord (I hope) It's DM GrumpyCat#7185 but please keep in mind I'm very busy IRL so I can't promise how quick I'll get back to you.)
Tepes
Posts: 54
Joined: Sun Feb 05, 2017 5:51 pm
Location: EU

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Tepes »

Tenser, Mordekainen, Melf and the boys should all call out on copyright infringement, if someone spells their spells incorrectly!
User avatar
Iceborn
Contributor
Contributor
Posts: 3471
Joined: Thu Jun 11, 2015 2:31 am
Location: Dancing on the line between sarcasm and irony

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Iceborn »

Hey, I know that my mage was delighted~ each time somebody used his terminology for magic.
Probs Morde and Tenser would too, but they ain't around to care about them! Nyek, nyek!

Don't click weird links, kiddos.

User avatar
Romeo and Jubilex
Posts: 72
Joined: Sun Mar 12, 2017 1:49 pm
Location: cj's house (underneath)

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Romeo and Jubilex »

It's more fun to keep it vague in my own opinion, but yeah. There's nothing stopping you from calling spells by their mechanical names.
JediZero
Posts: 175
Joined: Sat Oct 01, 2016 3:33 am

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by JediZero »

I've always operated under the idea that the 'english' names are just the nicknames and commonification or rough translations from draconic to common of certain spells.

For instance: in common its 'Magic Missile', in draconic it might be 'Missile of magic.' And IC whenever you're casting spells you're speaking in draconic as the language of magic in general (hence why wizards get it for free)

The idea being that there are quirks due to translations. The common name could simply explain what the spell does or be a quick reminder for it. Another good one would be "Lesser spell breach' and 'greater spell breach'.

Original spell would be LSB, and I figure the 'greater' is taking the earlier spell and just shoving more power into it to make sure it functions better. So instead of simply saying 'Lesser spell breach' in draconic, it would be 'Breach' and GSB would be 'Breach: Greater.' as it's a modification on the original spell. Then Common comes along and goes "oh, this one is called greater spell breach. . .Lets call the base version 'lesser'. Because that makes sense."

For spells with lesser, base, and greater, it might be more nuanced in that the base was probably first created, then experimentation was done with a less powerful version, and a greater version. So that naming convention would probably stick with it.

Of course this is all just my personal RP and none of it need be yours! Just offering some ideas.
LasharaDyran
Posts: 44
Joined: Sun Dec 04, 2016 3:48 am

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by LasharaDyran »

As another suggestion somewhat tagged into the above (since my character is JediZero's student it makes sense that they have a similar approach)....my character also uses the IG spell name as the common "lay term" for the spell. The challenge being that my character is a sorcerer and doesn't speak Draconic, so the other part of JZ's suggestion doesn't work for me.

However, being an innate caster my character tends to teach magic to her students in terms of intentions, ideas, colours and emotions. So something like flaming hands might be described as an "orange rage" and mage armor was described as "building a circular wall of white light around yourself'. It's a little esoteric, a little abstract and absolutely suited for my character.

I was both thrilled and a wee bit embarassed when my student sat down in the common room and proudly announced that she'd cast "PURPLE". You can use the spell names when you need to but there are ways to give it flavor.
taoofbalance
Posts: 330
Joined: Wed Sep 10, 2014 9:53 pm

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by taoofbalance »

LasharaDyran wrote:As another suggestion somewhat tagged into the above (since my character is JediZero's student it makes sense that they have a similar approach)....my character also uses the IG spell name as the common "lay term" for the spell. The challenge being that my character is a sorcerer and doesn't speak Draconic, so the other part of JZ's suggestion doesn't work for me.

However, being an innate caster my character tends to teach magic to her students in terms of intentions, ideas, colours and emotions. So something like flaming hands might be described as an "orange rage" and mage armor was described as "building a circular wall of white light around yourself'. It's a little esoteric, a little abstract and absolutely suited for my character.

I was both thrilled and a wee bit embarassed when my student sat down in the common room and proudly announced that she'd cast "PURPLE". You can use the spell names when you need to but there are ways to give it flavor.
I think this is a brilliant idea. To me it makes sense that characters without formal training wouldn't know its 'proper' name, and instead base it off something else such as colors and/or feelings. Which would then make some awesome RP say between...a sorcerer and a wizard.
"Typical larval god fetus..."-Patrick Rothfuss.
Tourmaline
Posts: 308
Joined: Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:51 am

Re: Is calling a spell by its name IG... metagaming?

Post by Tourmaline »

I think wizards are very similar to modern scientists and obviously there are magic colleges where many gather and study and share information and books. Considering there's a few hundred or so commonly used spells, I would think each would have a definitive name at least in educated circles. Not that you can't have leeway for your own RP if you want to change names, but don't come down on someone for calling Magic Missle by name.

Plus when you see a scroll in a shop, there's the name of the spell.
Tepes wrote:Tenser, Mordekainen, Melf and the boys should all call out on copyright infringement, if someone spells their spells incorrectly!
Wouldn't it be awesome if epic wizards could somehow create one new custom spell named after themselves? It's have to be a very limited thing and difficult thing of course but still.
Post Reply